| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
| 5. |  | GUIMARÃES, L. L.; HOLANDA, I. L. de; OLIVEIRA, L. D.; LACERDA, T. S.; PAIVA, G. R. de. Caracterização de genes candidatos à coordenação transcricional no parênquima durante a maturação do embrião de Arabidopsis thaliana. In: ENCONTRO DO TALENTO ESTUDANTIL DA EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA, 9., 2004, Brasília, DF. Anais: resumos dos trabalhos. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, 2004. p. 46.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|    |
| 6. | | STIER, L.; GUIMARÃES, L. L. F.; OLIVEIRA, M. Z. A. de; SANTANA, L. C. de; BARBOSA, C. de J. Trichoderma spp. associados à biota de solos de pomares de citros da Bahia. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA EMBRAPA MANDIOCA E FRUTICULTURA, 10., 2016: Cruz das Almas, BA. Traduzindo ciência para o mundo : resumos. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| 7. | | REIS, M. de O.; CAPRIOLI, R. A.; LAISSE, C. J. M.; GUIMARÃES, L. L. B.; ANDRADE, C. P. de; BOABAID, F. M.; SONNE, L.; DRIEMEIER, D. Surto de leptospirose em bezerros criados em resteva de arroz. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, n. 9, p.937-940, setembro. 2017. Título em inglês: Leptospirosis outbreak in calves maintained in a rice stubble field.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 8. | | REIS, M. de O.; SLAVIERO, M.; LORENZETT, M. P.; CRUZ, R. A. S.; GUIMARÃES, L. L. B.; PAVARINI, S. P.; DRIEMEIER, D.; SONNE, L. Neoplasmas bovinos diagnosticados no Setor de Patologia Veterinária da UFRGS, Porto Alegre (2005-2014). Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, n. 2, p. 105-109, fev. 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 9. | | HESSE, K. L.; FREDO, G.; GUIMARÃES, L. L. B.; REIS, M. O.; PIGATTO, J. A. T.; PAVARINI S. P.; DRIEMEIER, D.; SONNE, L. Neoplasmas oculares e de anexos em cães e gatos no Rio Grande do Sul: 265 casos (2009-2014) Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 35, n.1, p. 49-54, jan. 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/04/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/04/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
|
Autoria: |
MICCOLIS, A.; PENEIREIRO, F. M.; MARQUES, H. R.; VIEIRA, D. L. M.; ARCO-VERDE, M. F.; HOFFMANN, M. R.; REHDER, T.; PEREIRA, A. V. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANDREW MICCOLIS, WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE; FABIANA MONGELI PENEIREIRO, MUTIRÃO AGROFLORESTAL; HENRIQUE RODRIGUES MARQUES, INSTITUTO SALVIA DE SOLUÇÕES SOCIOAMBIENTAIS; DANIEL LUIS MASCIA VIEIRA, CENARGEN; MARCELO FRANCIA ARCO VERDE, CNPF; MAURÍCIO RIGON HOFFMANN, INKÓRA FLORESTAL; TATIANA REHDER, CHICO MENDES INSTITUTE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY; ABILIO VINICIUS BARBOSA PEREIRA, WWF BRASIL. |
|
Título: |
Agroforestry Systems for Ecological Restoration: how to reconcile conservation and production: options for Brazil’s Cerrado and Caatinga biomes. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: World Agroforestry Centre, 2016. |
|
Páginas: |
239 p. |
|
ISBN: |
978-85-63288-18-9 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
The main objective of this book is to guide the adoption of agroforestry systems (AFS) to restore and recover altered and degraded areas, using strategies that reconcile conservation with social benefits. It came about through a participatory research process involving extensionists, farmers, researchers, policy makers and practitioners in the field of restoration and AFS. We began by analyzing norms governing the use of AFS in environmental protection areas (Permanent Preservation Areas – PPAs and Legal Reserves – LRs), to make their practical implications in the field clear to extensionists, farmers and policy makers. A broad-ranging survey of relevant literature investigated the feasibility of AFS and the most suitable systems to accomplish the ecological and social goals of restoration. In May 2015, during a participatory seminar on “Conservation with Agroforestry: pathways to restoration on family farms,” 70 participants drafted principles and criteria to reconcile conservation with production. We then systematically analyzed 19 AFS experiences to draw lessons for best practices to be replicated, including visits to 16 farmers who shared their examples of promising management systems and practices, and consulted experts. With those inputs in hand, we propose recommendations to overcome challenges facing AFS and to draft enabling legislation for Brazil’s new Forest Code. We developed an approach to social-environmental diagnoses in AFS planning attuned to the aspirations and conditions of families in their own environments. For some of the most common situations, like degraded pastures and areas with secondary plant growth, we present 11 agroforestry options to be adapted to each farm’s specific characteristics. Recommendations include detailed descriptions of 19 key species for the recovery of degraded areas, and a total of 130 species deemed important for AFS-based restoration in a general table with functional attributes. Although this book focuses on Brazil’s Cerrado and Caatinga biomes, the approach for socio-environmental diagnoses, the principles and criteria for selecting species and designing systems, as well as the implementation and management techniques, can be applied in other regions as well. MenosThe main objective of this book is to guide the adoption of agroforestry systems (AFS) to restore and recover altered and degraded areas, using strategies that reconcile conservation with social benefits. It came about through a participatory research process involving extensionists, farmers, researchers, policy makers and practitioners in the field of restoration and AFS. We began by analyzing norms governing the use of AFS in environmental protection areas (Permanent Preservation Areas – PPAs and Legal Reserves – LRs), to make their practical implications in the field clear to extensionists, farmers and policy makers. A broad-ranging survey of relevant literature investigated the feasibility of AFS and the most suitable systems to accomplish the ecological and social goals of restoration. In May 2015, during a participatory seminar on “Conservation with Agroforestry: pathways to restoration on family farms,” 70 participants drafted principles and criteria to reconcile conservation with production. We then systematically analyzed 19 AFS experiences to draw lessons for best practices to be replicated, including visits to 16 farmers who shared their examples of promising management systems and practices, and consulted experts. With those inputs in hand, we propose recommendations to overcome challenges facing AFS and to draft enabling legislation for Brazil’s new Forest Code. We developed an approach to social-environmental diagnoses in AFS planning attuned to the aspirations... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroforestry Systems; Área degradada; Código florestal; Degraded areas; Restauração ecológica; Sistema agroflorestal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Familiar; Caatinga; Cerrado; Conservação; Sistema de Cultivo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agricultural conservation practice; Ecological restoration. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03416nam a2200373 a 4500
001 2163751
005 2024-04-19
008 2016 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
020 $a978-85-63288-18-9
100 1 $aMICCOLIS, A.
245 $aAgroforestry Systems for Ecological Restoration$bhow to reconcile conservation and production: options for Brazil’s Cerrado and Caatinga biomes.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aBrasília, DF: World Agroforestry Centre$c2016
300 $a239 p.
520 $aThe main objective of this book is to guide the adoption of agroforestry systems (AFS) to restore and recover altered and degraded areas, using strategies that reconcile conservation with social benefits. It came about through a participatory research process involving extensionists, farmers, researchers, policy makers and practitioners in the field of restoration and AFS. We began by analyzing norms governing the use of AFS in environmental protection areas (Permanent Preservation Areas – PPAs and Legal Reserves – LRs), to make their practical implications in the field clear to extensionists, farmers and policy makers. A broad-ranging survey of relevant literature investigated the feasibility of AFS and the most suitable systems to accomplish the ecological and social goals of restoration. In May 2015, during a participatory seminar on “Conservation with Agroforestry: pathways to restoration on family farms,” 70 participants drafted principles and criteria to reconcile conservation with production. We then systematically analyzed 19 AFS experiences to draw lessons for best practices to be replicated, including visits to 16 farmers who shared their examples of promising management systems and practices, and consulted experts. With those inputs in hand, we propose recommendations to overcome challenges facing AFS and to draft enabling legislation for Brazil’s new Forest Code. We developed an approach to social-environmental diagnoses in AFS planning attuned to the aspirations and conditions of families in their own environments. For some of the most common situations, like degraded pastures and areas with secondary plant growth, we present 11 agroforestry options to be adapted to each farm’s specific characteristics. Recommendations include detailed descriptions of 19 key species for the recovery of degraded areas, and a total of 130 species deemed important for AFS-based restoration in a general table with functional attributes. Although this book focuses on Brazil’s Cerrado and Caatinga biomes, the approach for socio-environmental diagnoses, the principles and criteria for selecting species and designing systems, as well as the implementation and management techniques, can be applied in other regions as well.
650 $aAgricultural conservation practice
650 $aEcological restoration
650 $aAgricultura Familiar
650 $aCaatinga
650 $aCerrado
650 $aConservação
650 $aSistema de Cultivo
653 $aAgroforestry Systems
653 $aÁrea degradada
653 $aCódigo florestal
653 $aDegraded areas
653 $aRestauração ecológica
653 $aSistema agroflorestal
700 1 $aPENEIREIRO, F. M.
700 1 $aMARQUES, H. R.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, D. L. M.
700 1 $aARCO-VERDE, M. F.
700 1 $aHOFFMANN, M. R.
700 1 $aREHDER, T.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. V. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
